首页> 外文OA文献 >No Smoke without Tobacco:A Global Overview of Cannabis and Tobacco Routes of Administration and Their Association with Intention to Quit
【2h】

No Smoke without Tobacco:A Global Overview of Cannabis and Tobacco Routes of Administration and Their Association with Intention to Quit

机译:没有烟草就没有烟:大麻和烟草的全球管理途径及其与戒烟的关联的全球概览

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Cannabis and tobacco are common drugs of abuse worldwide and are often used in combination through various routes of administration (ROAs). Here, we aimed to provide an overview of how cannabis and tobacco routes varied across countries and assess the impact of tobacco-based ROAs on motivation to use less cannabis, and less tobacco, in different models. A cross-sectional online survey (Global Drugs Survey 2014) was completed by 33,687 respondents (mean age = 27.9; % female = 25.9) who smoked cannabis at least once in the last 12 months. Most common ROA, frequency of cannabis/tobacco use, and questions about motivation to use less cannabis/tobacco were recorded. Tobacco-based ROA were used by 65.6% of respondents. These were most common in Europe (77.2–90.9%) and Australasia (20.7–51.6%) and uncommon in the Americas (4.4–16.0%). Vaporizer use was most common in Canada (13.2%) and the United States (11.2%). Using a non-tobacco ROA was associated with a 10.7% increase in odds for “desire to use less” tobacco (OR: 1.107, 95% CI: 1.003, 1.221), 80.6% increase in odds for “like help to use less tobacco” (OR: 1.806, 95% CI: 1.556, 2.095), and a 103.9% increase in the odds for “planning to seek help to use less tobacco” (OR: 2.039, 95% CI: 1.638, 2.539), in comparison to using a tobacco-based ROA. Associations between ROA and intentions to use less cannabis were inconsistent. Results support considerable global variation in cannabis and tobacco ROA. Tobacco routes are common, especially “joints with tobacco,” especially in Europe, but not in the Americas. Non-tobacco-based routes are associated with increased motivation to change tobacco use. Interventions addressing tobacco and cannabis need to accommodate this finding and encourage non-tobacco routes.
机译:大麻和烟草是世界范围内常见的滥用药物,通常通过各种给药途径(ROA)结合使用。在此,我们旨在概述各国之间的大麻和烟草路线如何变化,并评估以烟草为基础的ROA对不同模型中使用更少的大麻和更少的烟草的动机的影响。 33,687名受访者(平均年龄= 27.9;女性%= 25.9)完成了横断面在线调查(2014年全球毒品调查),他们在过去的12个月中至少抽烟一次。记录了最常见的ROA,大麻/烟草使用的频率以及有关减少大麻/烟草使用动机的问题。 65.6%的受访者使用基于烟草的ROA。这些在欧洲(77.2–90.9%)和大洋洲(20.7–51.6%)最常见,在美洲(4.4–16.0%)不常见。在加拿大(13.2%)和美国(11.2%),汽化剂的使用最为普遍。使用非烟草ROA与“希望减少使用烟草”的几率增加10.7%(或:1.107,95%CI:1.003,1.221),“喜欢减少吸烟”的几率增加80.6% ”(OR:1.806,95%CI:1.556,2.095),“计划寻求帮助以减少烟草使用”的几率增加了103.9%(OR:2.039,95%CI:1.638,2.539)使用基于烟草的ROA。 ROA与使用较少大麻的意图之间的关联不一致。结果支持大麻和烟草ROA的全球差异很大。烟草路线很普遍,尤其是“与烟草结合”,在欧洲尤其如此,但在美洲却不常见。非基于烟草的途径与改变烟草使用的动机增加有关。针对烟草和大麻的干预措施需要适应这一发现,并鼓励非烟草途径。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号